Rules and Regulations
| Important
University Notice | Registration, Enrolment, Courses Elsewhere
|
| Cancelling Courses; Withdrawing | Fees & Financial Assistance |
| Term Work, Tests | Final
Examinations |
| Grading Regulations, GPA | Appeals,
Petitions | Petitions on Term Work and Examinations;
Deadlines |
| Re-Assessment of Marks | Student
Records |
| Student TCard., Statement of Results; Transcripts | University Grading Practices Policy |
| Code of Behaviour on Academic Matters | Code of Student Conduct |
Changes in Subject Posts or Programs of Study
The subject POSts, or programs of study, that our calendar lists and describes are
available for the years to which the calendar applies. They may not necessarily be
available in later years. If the University or the Faculty must change the content of
programs of study or withdraw them, all reasonably possible advance notice and alternative
instruction will be given. The University, however, will not be liable for any loss,
damages, or other expenses that such changes might cause.
Changes in Courses
For each program of study offered by the University through the Faculty, the courses
necessary to complete the minimum requirements of the program will be made available
annually. We must, however, reserve the right otherwise to change the content of courses,
instructors and instructional assignments, enrolment limitations, pre-requisites and
co-requisites, grading policies, and timetables without prior notice.
Changes in Regulations and Policies
The University has several policies that are approved by the Governing Council and which
apply to all students. Each student must become familiar with the policies. The University
will assume that he or she has done so. The rules and regulations of the Faculty are
displayed here. Applicable University policies are either fully displayed here or listed
here. In applying to the Faculty the student assumes certain responsibilities to the
University and the Faculty and, if admitted and registered, shall be subject to the rules,
regulations, and policies cited in the calendar.
Calendar Limitations
The University makes every reasonable effort to plan and control enrolment to ensure that
all of our students are qualified to complete the programs to which they are admitted, and
to strike a practicable balance between enrolment and available instructional resources.
Sometimes such a balance cannot be struck and the number of qualified students exceeds the
instructional resources that we can reasonably make available while at the same time
maintaining the quality of instruction. In such cases, we must reserve the right to limit
enrolment in the programs, courses, or sections listed in the calendar, and to withdraw
courses or sections for which enrolment or resources are insufficient.
Copyright in Course Lectures
If a student wishes to tape-record, photograph, video-record or otherwise reproduce
lecture presentations, course notes or familiar materials provided by instructors, he or
she must obtain the instructor's written consent beforehand. Otherwise all such
reproduction is an infringement of copyright and is absolutely prohibited. In the case of
private use by physically disabled students, the instructor's consent will not be
unreasonably withheld.
Student Number
Each student at the University is assigned a unique identification number. The number is
confidential. The University, through the Policy on Access to Student Records, strictly
controls access to student numbers. The University assumes and expects that students will
protect the confidentiality of their student numbers.
REGISTRATION; ENROLMENT, COURSES ELSEWHERE
Registration
Details of the procedures by which students of the Faculty of Arts and Science register
and enrol in courses for which they are eligible, and pay or make arrangements to pay
fees, are found in the "Registration Handbook and Timetable", which students
receive from their college. (Any student allowed to register one day after the end of the
first week of classes is charged a late fee of $43.00; for each day thereafter the fee is
an additional $5.00.)
Passed Courses May Not Be Repeated
Students may not repeat any course in which they have already obtained a mark of 50% or
higher. The only exception occurs when students require a 100-series course with a
specific grade higher than "D" for entry to a limited-enrolment Program.
Students may repeat such a course once as an "extra" course, which will have no
effect on status or Grade-Point Average. There are no supplemental examinations or
provisions to "upgrade" a mark. All courses taken, except those officially
dropped, remain on the record.
Degree Courses & Extra Courses: Chronological Principle
Courses are credited towards a degree chronologically. For example, if a student has
already successfully completed six 100-series courses and then enrols in further
100-series courses, the more recent courses will be counted as "Extra" courses.
An exception occurs when a student who has completed 5.5 100-series courses enrols in a
full course at the 100-level in a subsequent session; the most recently taken half-course
becomes "extra".
Courses Outside the Faculty
See below, and the section on the Study Elsewhere Program.
Courses of Other Campuses
Subject to written Departmental and Faculty approval, students registered on the St.
George Campus may include a limited number of courses of Erindale College or Scarborough
College for degree credit. Students should consult their College Registrar. Students are
responsible for ensuring that courses taken on other campuses do not duplicate, nor are
exclusions of, their St. George Campus enrolments.
Courses of Other Divisions
Certain courses offered in other Faculties and Schools of the University may be
appropriate for degree credit for students in Arts and Science. After consulting an
academic advisor, students should petition to take these courses through their College
Registrar. The procedure must be initiated well in advance of the beginning of classes, so
students may choose alternate courses in case the request is rejected. Permission to take
such courses for degree credit is granted when students can establish that their
particular aims are valid for an Arts and Science program but cannot be met by courses
offered within the Faculty of Arts and Science. The Faculty will not accept as reasons for
taking courses in other divisions the wish to satisfy requirements to qualify for programs
and organizations outside the Faculty or to prepare for non-academic or professional
purposes. Acceptance of petitions to take graduate courses is further subject to the
requirements of the School of Graduate Studies. Special Students may enrol through this
Faculty only in courses given by this Faculty or by Scarborough College.
Courses of Other Universities (Letters Of Permission & Transfer Credit)
Degree students with a cumulative grade point average of at least 1.50 prior to studying
elsewhere may take a maximum of 5.0 courses elsewhere for transfer credit. Students
admitted with transfer credit may be limited in the number of courses that they may
transfer after admission and should consult their College Registrar about the number of
courses they may subsequently take elsewhere. Prior to taking courses at another Canadian
or American university, students are advised to request a Letter of Permission to confirm
acceptability of those courses for transfer credit. Otherwise, students may submit a
request for transfer credit after completing courses elsewhere. Permission obtained from
an instructor or from a department for program purposes, however, does not obligate the
Faculty to grant transfer credit. There is a $30.00 non-refundable charge for each
request. Assessments of transfer credit may take several weeks to process depending on the
time of year and the nature of the request. Applicants are responsible for submitting
requests well in advance of any deadlines they must meet and for obtaining the appropriate
counselling concerning the Letter of Permission and/or Transfer Credit process. NOTE: Only
one transfer credit may be used to satisfy the requirement of 300+ series courses for the
degree. Please refer to the information sheets on the Request for a Letter of Permission
and the Request for Transfer Credit in the Office of your College Registrar. Study
Elsewhere Program Participants should consult the Study Elsewhere Information Booklet for
the regulations that apply to them.
CANCELLING COURSES; WITHDRAWING
Cancelling Courses
Students who do not intend to complete a course or courses must use the Student Telephone
Service or the Student Web Service to withdraw from the course before the final date to
remove courses from the academic record (See Sessional Dates at front of Calendar).
Students still enrolled in a course after the final date to cancel the course will receive
a grade for that course. Not attending classes or ceasing to complete further course work
or not writing the examination do not constitute grounds for withdrawal without academic
penalty from a course; the course remains on the record with the grade earned, including
"0" for incomplete work.
Withdrawal from the Session
Students who wish to withdraw from all their current courses, and do not intend to enrol
in any other courses for the rest of the session (Fall, Winter or Summer) must withdraw
from the session by notifying their College Registrar in writing or by using the Student
Telephone Service or the Student Web Service. The withdrawal must be completed by the
appropriate deadline in order for the student not to incur an academic penalty. Before any
refund is authorized, they must:
- pay any outstanding fees;
- return any books to the Library and pay any outstanding fines;
- surrender their student cards;
- vacate any laboratory or athletic lockers and return any equipment in their possession.
Corrections to the Academic Record
The Faculty will accept requests for corrections to an academic record of the Fall-Winter
Session up to the following 13 November, and corrections to their record of the Summer
Session up to the following 12 February.
NOTE: students are responsible for ensuring that they provide a valid mailing
address to assure that they receive a Statement of Results at the end of the Fall-winter
and Summer Sessions. Students who cease attending a course without officially withdrawing
or after the withdrawal deadline will be considered to be enrolled in that course and it
will be included in their official Statement of Results.
FEES AND FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE
Schedule of Fees
Fees are subject to change at any time by approval of the Governing Council, so the
following information is only a general guide. It may be superseded by that in the
Schedule of Fees, which contains accurate, detailed information on tuition fees, payment
procedures and refunds. Students of Innis, New, University and Woodsworth Colleges receive
it from the University's Fees Department; students of St. Michael's, Trinity and Victoria
Colleges from their College Bursar.
Tuition fees normally consist of two parts: academic fees (including instruction and
library) and incidental fees (including Hart House, Health Service, Athletics, and student
organizations). Additional fees may also be assessed for such items as field trips and
laboratories.
Fees Invoice & Method Of Payment
Students receive with the Schedule of Fees a Fees Invoice, which must be submitted with
the appropriate payment according to the Schedule. Payment must be made at banks or trust
companies listed on the fees invoice.
Payment Deadlines (for the Fall-Winter Session)
Fees are due prior to registration and may be paid in full, or a minimum payment may be
made of 60% of academic fees and 100% of incidental fees as indicated on the Schedule. All
accounts must be paid in full by January 15th. To avoid delays and line-ups students are
advised to pay fees early. All outstanding balances, regardless of source of payment, are
subject to a service charge of 11/2% per month compounded, first assessed on October 15
and on the 15th of each month until the account is paid in full.
Students with outstanding accounts may not receive official transcripts and may not
re-register at the University until these accounts are paid.
Fees for Foreign Students
In accordance with the recommendation of the Government of Ontario, certain categories of
students who are neither Canadian citizens nor permanent residents of Canada are charged
higher academic fees. Refer to the Schedule of Fees or consult the Faculty Website for
details. Further information on fees may be obtained by students of Innis, New, University
and Woodsworth Colleges from the Fees Department, University of Toronto, 215 Huron St.,
Toronto, Ontario, M5S 1A2; (416) 978-2142. Students of St. Michael's, Trinity and Victoria
Colleges should consult their College Bursar.
Residence Fees
Detailed student residence information is contained in College brochures or College
Websites; consult the Faculty Website.
Financial Assistance
A limited number of in-course bursaries, scholarships and awards is available to students
who need financial assistance or who qualify for them on the basis of academic merit.
Information on these, and the Ontario Student Assistance Program, is available on the
Faculty Website or from the Office of the Faculty Registrar, Admissions and Awards, or the
College Registrars' offices.
Sanctions on Account of Outstanding Obligations
The following are recognized University obligations:
- tuition fees
- academic and other incidental fees
- residence fees and charges
- library fines
- loans made by Colleges, the Faculty or the University
- Health Service accounts
- unreturned or damaged instruments, materials and equipment
- orders for the restitution, rectification or the payment of damages, fines, bonds for
good behaviour, and requirement of public service work imposed under the authority of the
Code of Student Conduct.
The following academic sanctions are imposed on Arts and Science students with
outstanding University obligations:
- Official transcripts of record will not be issued;
- Registration will be refused to continuing or returning students. Payments made by
continuing or returning students will first be applied to outstanding University debts and
then to current fees.
TERM WORK; TESTS
Course Marks: Term Work & Term Test Regulations
The following regulations summarize the Faculty's implementation of the University's
Grading Practices Policy, Parts I and II of which are reprinted in full below (Part III is
an administrative appendix and is available upon request from the Office of the
Vice-President and Provost; however grade scales may be seen on page 430 of this
Calendar).
Marking Schemes
- Both essays (or equivalent work) and examinations (including term tests) are normally
required for standing in courses. In courses where only one form of evaluation is used, a
single piece of work cannot count for all of the final mark.
- Self-evaluation by individual students or by groups of students is not permissible
unless the specific consent of the Committee on Academic Standards is received.
- As early as possible in each course, and no later than the last date to enrol in
courses, the instructor must announce in a regularly-scheduled class the methods by which
student performance will be evaluated, their relative weight in the final mark, including
any discretionary factor, and the due dates. These methods must be in accord with
applicable University and Faculty policies (See TERM WORK and TERM TEST below, especially
bold-faced items.) Instructors must file a copy of their marking scheme for each course
with the Departmental or Program Office at the beginning of the term.
- Once the weight of each component of the course work is given, it may not be changed
unless approved by a majority of the students present and voting at a regularly-scheduled
meeting of the class.
- After the last date to withdraw from the course without academic penalty, no change in
marks weighting may take place unless there is unanimous consent of all students present
and voting, and notice must be given at the regularly-scheduled class meeting previous to
that at which the issue is to be raised.
- Students may petition for deletion of the course from their record and receive an
appropriate fees refund, should an infraction of the Grading Practices Policy occur.
Petitions must be filed by the last day of classes, before all course work has been
completed.
Term Work
- Instructors MUST assign, grade and return at least one significant assignment as early
as possible, and at the latest BEFORE the final date to withdraw without academic penalty.
- All term work must be submitted on or before the last day of classes in the course
concerned, unless an earlier date is specified by the instructor. Students who for reasons
beyond their control are unable to submit an assignment by its deadline must obtain
approval from their instructor for an extension of the deadline. This extension may be for
no longer than the end of the Final Examination period. If additional time beyond this
period is required, students must petition through their College Registrar before the end
of the examination period for a further extension of the deadline.
- Students are strongly advised to keep rough and draft work and copies of their essays
and assignments, as these may be required by the instructor.
- All written work that has been evaluated should be returned with such detailed comment
as the instructor deems appropriate, and time made available for discussion of it. Any
enquiries about a graded piece of work must be made within one month of the return date of
the work. Instructors must keep unclaimed term work for at least six months beyond the end
of the course.
Term Tests
- No term test or combination of term tests held in the last two weeks of classes at the
end of any term may have a total weight greater than 25% of the final mark.
- All term tests must be held on or before the last day of classes. No term test may be
held during the "Reading Week" in February, during the "Study Week" in
April, or during Faculty Examination Periods, except for those in Y-courses scheduled by
the Faculty in December.
- Missed Term Tests: Students who miss a term test will be assigned a mark of zero for
that test unless they satisfy the following conditions:
- Students who miss a term test for reasons entirely beyond their control may, within one
week of the missed test, submit to the instructor or department/program a written request
for special consideration explaining the reason for missing the test, and attaching
appropriate documentation, such as a medical certificate.
- If a written request with documentation cannot be submitted within one week, the
department may consider a request to extend the time limit.
- A student whose explanation is accepted by the department will be entitled to one of the
following considerations:
- In courses where there is no other term work as part of the evaluation scheme, a makeup
test must be given.
- In other courses, the department/program may either give a makeup test OR increase the
weighting of other graded work by the amount of the missed test. In no case may the
weighting of the final examination in a 100-level course be increased beyond 2/3 of the
total course mark.
- If the student is granted permission to take a makeup test and misses it, then he or she
is assigned a mark of zero for the test unless the department/program is satisfied that
missing the makeup test was unavoidable. No student is automatically entitled to a second
makeup test*.
- A student who misses a term test cannot subsequently petition for late withdrawal from
the course without academic penalty on the grounds that he or she has had no term work
returned before the drop date.
* NOTE: this means that if a department is persuaded of the student's grounds for
missing the makeup test, it may decide to compensate for the missed test in whatever way
it chooses, which could be by giving another makeup test; the student cannot demand
another makeup test.
FINAL EXAMINATIONS
Faculty Final Examinations; Outside Examination Centres
Students taking courses during the day may be required to write evening examinations, and
students taking evening courses may be required to write day examinations.
A Faculty final examination common to all sections of the course and counting for between
one-third and two-thirds of the final mark must be held in each 100-series course, unless
exemption has been granted by the Committee on Academic Standards. In 200-, 300- and
400-series courses, the Departments will decide whether or not an examination is
appropriate, and report to the Committee.
Final examinations are held at the end of each session or subsession. Students who make
personal commitments during the examination period do so at their own risk. No special
consideration is given and no special arrangements are made in the event of conflicts.
Information regarding dates, times and locations of examinations will not be given by
telephone.
Students who have two Faculty final examinations in the same time slot, or three
consecutive Faculty final examinations (e.g., morning, afternoon, evening; or afternoon,
evening, next morning) should contact the Office of the Faculty Registrar.
The ratio of term marks to examination mark will be the same for all sections of
multi-section courses that have final examinations. The relative value of each part of a
written examination must be indicated on the question paper.
Rules for the Conduct of Examinations
- No person will be allowed in an examination room during an examination except the
candidates concerned and those supervising the examination.
- Candidates must appear at the examination room at least twenty minutes before the
commencement of the examination.
- Candidates shall bring their signed student cards and place them in a conspicuous place
on their desks. Candidates registered in the Faculty of Arts and Science must have a
student registration card bearing their photograph.
- Bags and books are to be deposited in areas designated by the Chief Presiding Officer
and are not to be taken to the examination desk or table. Students may place their purses
on the floor under their chairs.
- The Chief Presiding Officer has authority to assign seats to candidates.
- Candidates shall not communicate with one another in any manner whatsoever during the
examination.
- No materials shall be brought into the room or used at an examination except those
authorized by the Chief Presiding Officer or Examiner.
- Candidates who bring any unauthorized material into an examination room or who assist or
obtain assistance from other candidates or from any unauthorized source are liable to
penalties under the Code of Behaviour on Academic Matters, including the loss of academic
credit and expulsion.
- No cellular telephones or pagers shall be brought into an examination room by
candidates.
- In general, candidates will not be permitted to enter an examination room later than
fifteen minutes after the commencement of the examination, nor to leave except under
supervision until at least half an hour after the examination has commenced.
- Candidates shall remain seated at their desks during the final ten minutes of each
examination.
- At the conclusion of an examination, all writing shall cease. The Chief Presiding
Officer may seize the papers of candidates who fail to observe this requirement, and a
penalty may be imposed at the discretion of the instructor.
- Examination books and other material issued for the examination shall not be removed
from the examination room except by authority of the Chief Presiding Officer.
Outside Centre/Special Accommodations Fee
Students who request permission to write an examination outside the normal examination
arrangements must submit a petition making their request at least three weeks prior to the
beginning of the examination period. Late requests cannot be accommodated. A
non-refundable fee of $30.00 for each examination is charged at the time of application.
Students who have been granted permission to write a deferred examination will pay this
fee in addition to the deferred examination fee of $70.00 per examination.
For "Outside Centre" examinations, students are also responsible for all costs
for invigilation, postage, etc. charged by the centres involved. These costs can reach as
high as $100.00 per examination; students are advised to determine the total cost before
petitioning. Such permission is granted only in the most extreme circumstances.
GRADING REGULATIONS, GPA
Grades Review Procedure
The Committee on Academic Standards administers the Grading Regulations, and reviews
course grades submitted by Departments. The Faculty, through this Committee, is
responsible for assigning the official course grades, which are communicated to the
students by the Faculty Registrar.
Each Chair appoints a departmental review committee to review grades submitted by
instructors. The committee may ask for clarification of any anomalous results or
distributions, or disparity between sections of the same courses. Both the departmental
review committee, through the Chair, and the Faculty review committee, through the Dean,
have the right, in consultation with the instructor of the course, to adjust marks where
there is an obvious and unexplained discrepancy between the marks submitted and the
perceived standards of the Faculty. Final marks are official, and may be communicated to
the students only after the review procedure has taken place. Grades, as an expression of
the instructor's best judgment of each student's overall performance, will not be
determined by any system of quotas.
Marks and Grades
Percentage |
Letter Grade |
Grade Point Value * |
Grade Definition |
90-100 |
A+ |
4.0 |
Excellent |
Strong evidence of original thinking; good organization; capacity to
analyze and synthesize; superior grasp of subject matter with sound critical evaluations;
evidence of extensive knowledge base. |
85-89 |
A |
4.0 |
80-84 |
A- |
3.7 |
77-79 |
B+ |
3.3 |
Good |
Evidence of grasp of subject matter, some evidence of capacity and
analytic ability; reasonable understanding of relevent issues; evidence of familiarity
with literature |
73-76 |
B |
3.0 |
70-72 |
B- |
2.7 |
67-69 |
C+ |
2.3 |
Adequate |
Student who is profiting from his/her university experience; understanding
of the subject matter; ability to develop solutions to simple problems in the material. |
63-66 |
C |
2.0 |
60-62 |
C- |
1.7 |
57-59 |
D+ |
1.3 |
Marginal |
Some evidence of familiarity with subject matter and some evidence that
critical and analytic skills have been developed. |
53-56 |
D |
1.0 |
50-52 |
D- |
0.7 |
0-49 |
F |
0.0 |
Inadequate |
Little evidence of even superficial understanding of subject matter;
weakness in critical and analytic skills; with limited or irrelevant use of literature. |
(Credit/No Credit: CR/NCR is not in general use in the Faculty)
*The grade point values above apply to marks earned in individual courses; grade point
averages are weighted sums of the grade points earned (see below), and thus do not
necessarily correspond exactly to the scale above. For example, a B+ average would include
grade point averages from 3.20 to 3.49, while the lowest B- average would be 2.50.
Note: In order to "obtain standing" in a course, a student must
receive at least a passing grade (50%) in that course. A Grade of "F" is a
failure. There are no supplemental examination privileges in the Faculty.
Other notations, which have no grade point values, and which may be authorized only by
petition, are:
AEG |
Aegrotat Standing on the basis of term work and medical evidence |
NGA |
No Grade Available |
GWR |
Grade withheld pending Review |
IPR |
(Course) In Progress |
SDF |
Standing Deferred granted by petition |
WDR |
Late Withdrawal without academic penalty after the relevant deadline |
XTR or X |
Extra Course not for degree credit |
Removal of a grade for incomplete work when withdrawal before the end of the
course has been caused by circumstances beyond the student's control, arising after the
last date for normal withdrawal. Changes to the record will be authorized by petition only
in exceptional circumstances.
Grade Point Average
The Grade Point Average is the weighted sum (a full course is weighted as 2, a half-course
as 1) of the grade points earned, divided by the number of courses in which grade points
were earned. However, courses noted "AEG" are not included in the average, nor
are transfer credits, courses taken elsewhere on a Letter of Permission, nor courses
designated as "extra". Courses taken as Special Students and Visiting Students
are included in the CGPA.
Three types of grade point averages are used:
- The Sessional GPA is based on courses taken in a single session (Fall, Winter or
Summer);
- The Annual GPA is based on courses taken in the Fall-Winter Sessions;
- The Cumulative GPA takes into account all courses taken for degree credit in the
Faculty.
A Sessional, Annual, and Cumulative GPA is also calculated for all Special and Visiting
Students. For Special Students who have completed a degree in the Faculty, the Cumulative
GPA includes all courses taken both as a degree student and as a Special Student.
Academic Status
There are four kinds of academic status: In Good Standing; On Probation; On Suspension;
Refused Further Registration
Academic status is assessed twice a year:
- at the end of the Winter Session; the GPAs used for this status assessment are the
annual and the cumulative GPAs.
- at the end of the Summer Session; the GPAs used for this status assessment are the
sessional and the cumulative GPAs.
In Good Standing:
Students are described as In Good Standing if they are neither On Probation, Suspended nor
Refused Further Registration; these terms are explained below. For students with
particularly noteworthy academic results, there are three specific forms of recognition,
which are described in Section 2.
Probation; Suspension; Refused Further Registration
The following regulations apply to Degree, Special and Visiting students who have
attempted at least four courses * in the Faculty.
- A student shall be on academic probation who
- has a cumulative GPA of less than 1.50 or
- returns from suspension.
- A student who, at the end of the Winter or Summer Session during which he or she is on
probation
- has a cumulative GPA of 1.50 or more shall be in good standing
- has a cumulative GPA of less than 1.50 but an annual GPA of 1.70 or more (Winter
Session)/sessional GPA of 1.70 or more (Summer Session) shall continue on probation.
- has a cumulative GPA of less than 1.50 and an annual GPA of less than 1.70 (Winter
Session)/sessional GPA of less than 1.70 (Summer Session) shall be suspended for one
calendar year unless he or she has been so suspended previously, in which case he or she
shall be suspended for three years.
- In highly exceptional circumstances a student suspended from the university on academic
grounds may be granted De Novo status by the committee on Standing. Henceforth the
student's GPA begins anew for program and graduation purposes. The student granted De Novo
status is considered to have attempted at least four courses in the Faculty and proceeds
under the regulations above. The student's original record remains intact and shows on his
or her transcript as part of the complete academic record produced in response to future
transcript requests.
- A student who, having been suspended for three years, is again liable for suspension
shall be refused further registration in the Faculty.
* Courses attempted are those in which a student remains formally enrolled on the last
date for withdrawal, unless the academic penalty normally attached to a later withdrawal
is removed by petition.
APPEALS, PETITIONS
Departmental Appeals
Issues arising within a course that concern the pedagogical relationship of the instructor
and the student, such as the organization of a course, grading practices, or conduct of
instructors, fall within the authority of the department or college sponsoring the course.
Students are encouraged to discuss any issues regarding the academic aspects of a course
with the instructor. It is recommended that if appropriate an issue should be documented
in writing. The successive stages of appeal after the course instructor are as follows:
the Undergraduate Secretary; the Chair of the Department or the College Program Director;
then the Dean of the Faculty. An appeal must have been reviewed at the departmental level
before referral to the Dean; appeals to the Dean MUST be in writing.
Petitions to the Faculty
Issues relating to degree requirements and administrative regulations may be petitioned to
the Faculty within specific time limitations. The Faculty considers petitions to have
regulations waived or varied, if a student presents compelling reasons; however, students
must convince the Faculty that they have acted responsibly and with good judgment in
observing Faculty regulations. The Committee on Standing routinely denies petitions that
in its view do not present a valid reason for an exemption from the regulations. Students
are encouraged to seek counselling and, if necessary, to initiate a petition through the
office of their College Registrar.
Petitions must 1) state the student's request; 2) the reasons for the request in a clear
and concise manner; and 3) be accompanied by relevant supporting documentation. The
petition is considered in confidence by the Committee on Standing, which is charged with
interpreting and administering the regulations of the Faculty. The Committee has the
authority to grant exceptions and to attach conditions to its decisions.
It is the responsibility of the student to provide an accurate address to which a petition
decision may be sent. Non-receipt of a decision due to postal error or incorrect address
is not grounds for reconsideration.
Deadlines to File Petitions
Term Work |
The last day of the examination period |
Examinations |
Within one week of the end of the examination period
End of first week of classes in January for the December examination period |
Withdrawal |
Winter Session courses: the following 14 November
Summer Session courses: the following 13 February |
ALL SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION MUST BE SUBMITTED WITHIN THREE WEEKS OF THE DATE OF
INITIATING THE PETITION. LATE PETITIONS AND PETITIONS WITH LATE DOCUMENTATION WILL NOT BE
CONSIDERED.
Documentation in Support of Petitions
The Faculty seeks documentation that provides pertinent evidence for decisions determining
whether or not an exception should be made to regulations that are designed to ensure
equitable treatment for all students.
Medical Documentation
The University of Toronto Student Medical Certificate must be submitted in support of a
request for an exemption from Faculty regulations, if illness is being used as the reason
for the request. The claim of illness, however, is not sufficient grounds in itself to
guarantee approval of the request. This certification is available at Health Services, the
Office of the Faculty Registrar, College Registrar's Offices, departments and other
offices of the University as well as in the Registration Handbook and Timetable. Other
medical notes will not be accepted. Note that the physician's report must establish that
the patient was examined and diagnosed at the time of illness, not after the fact. The
Faculty will not accept a statement that merely confirms a report of illness made by the
student for documentation by the physician.
N.B. Students who are granted DEFERRED STANDING (i.e., a grade of
"SDF", for an extension of time for term work or for a deferred examination) or
permission to re-write an examination and who have earned a Cumulative Grade Point Average
of less than 1.50 will not be permitted to enrol in further courses until the outstanding
course work has been completed and final cumulative and sessional GPAs and status for the
session have been assessed.
PETITIONS ON TERM WORK AND EXAMINATIONS; DEADLINES
Petitions Regarding Term Work
Matters concerning term work normally fall within the authority of the instructor.
Students unable to comply with given deadlines must contact their instructor prior to the
deadline if an extension to the deadline is requested. All term work must be submitted by
the last day of classes, unless an earlier date has been specified. Instructors may grant
extensions beyond their own deadlines or beyond the last day of classes up to the last day
of the examination period provided that a student presents reasons of illness, etc., with
appropriate documentation. Extensions beyond the last day of the examination period
interfere with the Faculty's schedule for the submission of final grades and must
therefore be approved by petition. These petitions for an extension of time for term work
must be initiated by the last day of the relevant examination period. Late requests will
not be accepted. Students must file the petition after consultation with the instructor
regarding a suitable extension date. The Committee on Standing consults the department
concerned for information about the status of the course work, and the steps, if any, that
must be taken to complete the course. Students seeking an extension of time for term work
are expected to continue their course work while they await a decision. They will not be
granted additional time after the petition decision has been issued.
Petitions Regarding Examinations
Petitions regarding final examinations must be submitted within five days after the end of
the examination period. Late requests will not be accepted. Petitions based on travel,
employment, or personal plans will not be considered. Students who for legitimate reasons
are unable to write an examination may petition to write a deferred examination at the
next available opportunity. These are normally scheduled as follows:
Final Examinations; Deferred Examinations
April/May |
June examination period, if course is offered in Summer Session May to June;
August examination period for all others |
June |
August examination period, if course offered in Summer Session May/July - August
December examination period, if course offered in Fall Session
August examination periods for all others |
August |
December examination period |
December |
April/May examination period, if course offered in Winter Session
Reading Week for all others |
Students are required to confirm their intent to write a deferred examination and to
pay a fee of $70.00 for each deferred examination by a specified date prior to the
examination period. Those who do not respond lose the privilege of a deferred examination
and their grade reverts to one that includes a "0" for the final examination.
Students are informed as early as possible of the date, time and location of the deferred
examination. Students who must write a deferred examination in a course that serves as a
prerequisite for subsequent courses may enrol in those courses with the approval of the
department concerned and provided that the term mark in the prerequisite (deferred) course
is at least 60%.
Students who miss a deferred examination receive a grade of "0" for the
examination in the calculation of the final grade. If the Faculty accepts the student's
reasons for missing a deferred examination as legitimate, a further deferred examination
may be permitted; however, the "SDF" notation will be replaced by the original
grade. Students are charged a further fee for each subsequent deferred examination. Note
that in such situations of further deferrals the Committee on Standing regularly prohibits
registration in further sessions until the outstanding course work has been completed.
Appeals Against Petition Decisions
Appeals against petition decisions progress as follows:
- First petition to the Committee on Standing by appropriate deadline submitted through
College Registrar;
- Appeal to the Committee on Standing within ninety days of the first decision; second
petition submitted through the College Registrar;
- Appeal to the Faculty Academic Appeals Board within ninety days of the second decision;
written request for a hearing submitted through the College Registrar;
- Appeal to the Academic Appeals Committee of Governing Council within ninety days of the
decision of the Faculty Academic Appeals Board; written request for a hearing submitted
directly to the Governing Council Office in Simcoe Hall.
Reassessment of Marks
Reread of Final Examination
If a student believes that a final examination has been incorrectly marked in its
substance, he/she may request a "reread." The student must first purchase a
photocopy of the final examination from the Office of the Faculty Registrar, for a fee of
$13.00 per course. The student must then fill out a "Request for Reread of Final
Examination" form, which is available at College Registrar's Offices and at the
Office of the Faculty Registrar. The student must demonstrate that his/her answers are
substantially correct by citing specific instances of disagreement, supported by such
documentary evidence as course handouts, textbooks, lecture notes, etc. The student must
do more than simply assert that "I disagree with the marking," or that "I
believe I deserve more marks." The Department concerned will reread the examination
in light of the arguments presented. There is a $35.00 fee for this procedure, which is in
addition to the fee of $13.00 charged for the photocopy of the final examination. The fee
must be submitted, with the completed form, to the Office of the Faculty Registrar within
six months of the final examination period. If the mark is changed as a result of this
review both the photocopy and reread fees will be refunded. It should be noted that when a
course is failed, the examination must be reread before the mark is reported.
Recheck of Course Mark
If a student believes that there has been an arithmetical error in calculating the course
mark, he/she may request a "recheck." This can be done with or without
purchasing a photocopy of the final examination. The student must fill out a "Request
for Recheck of Course Mark" form, which is available at College Registrar's Offices
and at the Office of the Faculty Registrar. The student must indicate precisely where
he/she thinks the error has occurred. The Department concerned will check that all answers
have been marked, and that the marks have been added correctly; the examination will not
be reread. The Department will also check that all term work marks have been correctly
calculated. There is a $13.00 fee for this procedure, which is in addition to the $13.00
fee charged for the photocopy of the final examination. The fee must be submitted, with
the completed form, to the Office of the Faculty Registrar within six months of the final
examination period. If the mark is changed as a result of this review, both the photocopy
and recheck fees will be refunded.
NOTE: A reread or recheck may result in a raised mark, a lowered mark, or no
change.
Deadlines for requesting a photocopy of a final examination, a reread or a recheck:
February examinations |
the following August 30 |
April/May examinations |
the following November 15 |
June examinations |
the following January 15 |
August examinations |
the following February 28/29 |
December examinations |
the following June 30 |
STUDENT RECORDS
The "official student academic record" is maintained by the Faculty, which
shall designate the document, form or medium containing the official version and how
official copies of such information will be identified. Student academic records refer to
information concerning admission to, and academic performance at, this University. The
"official student academic record" contains:
- personal information which is required in the administration of official student
academic records such as name, student number, citizenship, social insurance number;
- registration and enrolment information;
- results for each course and academic period;
- narrative evaluations of a student's academic performance, used to judge his or her
progress;
- results of petitions and appeals;
- medical information relevant to a student's academic performance, furnished at the
request or with the consent of the student;
- letters of reference, whether or not they have been provided on the understanding that
they shall be maintained in confidence;
- personal and biographical information such as address, and telephone number.
Access to Student Academic Records
- Access by a student.
- Students may examine and have copies made of their academic record as defined above,
with the exception of those portions of the record which comprise letters of reference
which have been provided or obtained on the expressed or implied understanding that they
shall be maintained in confidence. A student may however, be advised of the identity of
the authors of any confidential letters contained in his or her official academic record.
- Students' requests to examine any part of their "official student academic
record" shall be made in writing and shall be complied with within thirty days of
receipt.
- Students may challenge the accuracy of their academic record with the exception of the
materials specifically excluded above and may have their record supplemented with comments
so long as the sources of such comments are identified and the official student academic
record remains securely within the custody of the academic division. Reference to such
comments would not necessarily appear on official academic reports such as the transcript
or the Statement of Results. (Note that access to medical information shall only be
granted to members of the teaching and administrative staff with the prior expressed or
implied consent of the student and, if applicable, in the case of a medical assessment,
the originator (physician, etc.) of such.)
- It is assumed that all documents relating to petitions and appeals and not provided on
the understanding that they shall be maintained in confidence will be retained within the
division, and when needed by the student, will be made freely available. In addition, The
Statutory Powers Procedure Act, 1971 of Ontario requires that where the good character,
propriety of conduct or competence of a party is in issue in any proceedings in a tribunal
to which the Act applies (such as the Academic Appeals Board of the Governing Council),
the part is entitled to be furnished prior to the hearing with "reasonable
information" of any allegations with respect hereto.
- Access by University Staff. Members of the teaching and administrative staff of the
University shall have access to relevant portions of a student's academic record in the
performance of their duties.
- Access by U. of T. campus organizations. Student organizations in the U. of T. may have
access to all information available freely to persons outside the university and to the
residence address and telephone number of the student, for the legitimate internal use of
that organization.
- Access by Others
- By the act of registration, a student gives implicit consent for a minimal amount of
information to be made freely available to all inquirers:
- the academic divisions(s) and the session(s) in which a student is or has been
registered,
- degree(s) received and date(s) of convocation.
- Any other information shall be released to other persons and agencies only with the
student's prior expressed written consent, or on the presentation of a court order, or in
accordance with the requirements of professional licencing or certification bodies or the
Ministry of Colleges and Universities for an annual enrolment audit, or otherwise under
compulsion of law. A record shall be kept of permissions granted to any persons or
agencies outside the university for access to a student's academic record.
- General statistical material drawn from academic records not disclosing the identities
of students may be released for research and informational purposes.
Refusal of Access
The University reserves the right to withhold transcripts of students who have outstanding
debts.
Custody of Student Academic Records
Academic records are normally under the custodial responsibility of the academic
divisions. Fifty years after a student has ceased to be registered, all such records
become the responsibility of the University Archivist and become open to researchers
authorized by the University of Toronto.
Personal Information
Personal information is a vital part of the student's official University record and is
used to issue statements of results, transcripts, graduation information, diplomas and
other official documents. The University is also required by law to collect certain
information for the Federal and Provincial Governments; this is reported only in aggregate
form and is considered confidential by the University.
Any change in the following must therefore be reported immediately to the College
Registrar:
- legal name;
- Social Insurance Number;
- citizenship status in Canada;
- Address Change: Address information (sessional and home) may be viewed and changed on
the Student Web Service (see Web address at bottom of this page) or in your College
Registrar's Office.
STUDENT TCARD., STATEMENT OF RESULTS; TRANSCRIPTS
T-Card
The T Card is a wallet-sized card bearing the student's photograph, and serves as evidence
of registration in the Faculty and as a library card. It is used for identification
purposes within the University, such as Faculty examinations, student activities, and
Athletic Association privileges. The loss of the card must be reported promptly to the
College Registrar, and the card must be surrendered if a student withdraws from the
University or transfers to another College or Faculty. There is a fee for the replacement
of lost cards.
Statement of Results
Statements of Results are sent to students at their mailing address at the end of the
Winter and Summer Sessions. Students should expect to receive their Statements within six
weeks of the end of the examination period, and should contact their College Registrar
immediately if the Statement of Results has not been received. Statements of Results are
not issued at the end of the Fall Session. Results for "F" courses are available
on the Student Telephone Service and Web Service and at College Registrars' offices in
January for the Fall Session and in July for the first subsession of the Summer Session.
Transcripts
The transcript of a student's record reports courses in progress and the standing in all
courses attempted along with course average, information about the student's academic
status including record of suspension and refusal of further registration, and completion
of degree requirements and of a subject POSt.
Final course results are added to each student's record at the end of each session and
Summer subsession. GPAs are calculated at the end of each session. Individual courses that
a student cancels within the normal time limit are not shown.
Copies of the transcript are issued at the student's request, subject to reasonable
notice. Requests should be submitted in person or by writing the Office of the Faculty
Registrar, Faculty of Arts and Science, Sidney Smith Hall, 100 St. George St., Toronto M5S
3G3. In accordance with the University's policy on access to student records, the
student's signature is required for the release of the record. There is no charge for
transcripts issued within the University for internal use. A fee of $6.00 (plus G.S.T. and
P.S.T., total $6.90) is charged for each copy to all other destinations. Letters of
Confirmation are $6.00. Payment MUST accompany such requests.
Beginning May 3, 199, the University of Toronto will issue only a consolidated
transcript, including a student's total academic record at the University. Students may
request consolidated transcripts on the Web at: www.rosi.utoronto.ca. Requests may also be
made in person or by writing the University of Toronto Transcript Centre at Room 1006,
Sidney Smith Hall, 100 St. George Street, Toronto M5S 3G3. A fee of $8.00 (pending review)
which includes G.S.T. and P.S.T., is charged for each transcript. Cheques and money orders
should be made payable to the University of Toronto. Students must indicate at the time of
the request if the purpose of the transcript is for enclosure in a self-administered
application. Such transcripts are issued in specially sealed envelopes.
The University of Toronto cannot be responsible for transcripts lost or delayed in the
mail. Transcripts are not issued for students who have outstanding financial obligations
with the University.
UNIVERSITY GRADING PRACTICES POLICY
Purpose
The purpose of the University Grading Practices Policy is to ensure:
- that grading practices throughout the University reflect appropriate academic standards;
- that the evaluation of student performance is made in a fair and objective manner
against these academic standards;
- that the academic standing of every student can be accurately assessed even when courses
have been taken in different divisions of the University and evaluated according to
different grade scales.
Application of Policy
The Policy applies to all individuals and committees taking part in the evaluation of
student performance in degree, diploma, and certificate credit courses (hereafter referred
to as courses).
Amendment to Policy
Amendments to the Policy shall be recommended to the Academic Board. Changes to the
divisional regulations on grading practices shall be forwarded to the Committee on
Academic Policy and Programs.
Distribution of Policy
A copy of the Grading Practices Policy as well as the description of the grade scales and
the substance of divisional regulations indicated in Part II of this Policy shall be
published in the Calendar of the division. Similarly a copy shall be given to all students
upon initial registration and to all instructors and others, including teaching
assistants, involved in the evaluation of student performance. The Policy is in three
parts: Part I deals with grades, Part II outlines grading procedures to be adhered to in
divisional regulations adopted as part of this Policy, and Part III is an administrative
appendix available upon request from the Office of the Provost.
PART I: GRADES
Grades are a measure of the performance of a student in individual courses. Each
student shall be judged on the basis of how well he or she has command of the course
materials.
Meaning of Grades
- A grade assigned in a course is not an assessment of standing within a program of
studies. To determine the requirements for credit and standing in a program of studies,
the academic regulations of the division in which the program is offered should be
consulted.
- Grades for each course shall be assigned with reference to the following meanings (which
may be expanded in the divisional regulations under Part II): Excellent, Good, Adequate,
Marginal, Inadequate.
Grade Scales
- Once a judgment on the performance of the student has been made, the following grade
scales are to be used:
- the refined letter grade scale: A+, A, A-, B+, B, B-, C+, C, C-, D+, D, D-, F;
- the numerical scale of marks, consisting of all integers from 0 - 100; and/or
- for graduate divisions only, a truncated refined letter grade scale in which FZ replaces
the C, D and F grades in (a) above.
- the scales Honours/Pass/Fail and Credit/No Credit.
Grades vs. Scores
- Grades should always be based on the approved grade scales. However, students may find
that on any one evaluation they may receive a numerical or letter mark that reflects the
score achieved on the test or essay. The cumulative scores may not be directly identified
with the final grade. Grades are final only after review by the divisional review
committee described below.
(NOTE: A table of correspondence and a translation table are defined (under
"Grading Regulations" in Section Six of the Calendar) for each of the letter
grade scales referred to in I.3(a) in order to allow the conversion, when necessary, of a
grade assigned from one scale to the corresponding grade in another. It should be noted
that these tables are not to be used to translate a score to a grade directly.) Grade
Reporting
- Grades will be assigned according to the numerical scale of marks referred to in 1.3 (b)
above, and converted to the refined letter grade scale of 1.3(a) above. The H/P/FL and
CR/NCR scales of 1.3(d) above may also be used. However, the grades assigned in a course
must all be from the same scale.
- All non-grade designators used in reporting course results must correspond to the
University-wide standard. A list of the currently approved designators and their meanings
is given in the Appendix A.2 (see Arts & Science Calendar, page $$$).
- The information in grade reports and transcripts must be communicated to the user,
whether within or outside the University, in a clear and meaningful way. To that end,
transcripts must include:
- an enrolment history, which traces chronologically the student's entire participation at
the University;
- a "grade point average" based on a 4-point scale for all undergraduate
divisions (Note: grade point average values will be assigned as follows A+/A = 4.0; A- =
3.7, B+ = 3.3, B = 3.0, B- = 2.7, C+ = 2.3, C= 2.0, C= 1.7, D+ = 1.3, D = 1.0, D- = 0.7, F
= 0.0),
- an average grade for each course expressed using the refined letter grade scale (Note:
these calculations should be restricted to courses of a specific size),
- both numeric mark and its letter grade equivalent, where possible, for all courses,
- course weight values, expressed using a uniform system of values allowing for the
relative values needed by each division,
- transfer credits granted,
- academic honours, scholarships and awards sanctioned by the University,
- a comprehensive guide explaining all grades and symbols used on the transcript.
PART II: GRADING PROCEDURES
Approval of Grades
Grades shall be recommended by the instructor to the chair or division head. The grades
shall then be reviewed and approved following the divisional review procedure. Grades
shall not be reported or released to students as official until the divisional review
procedure has been carried out. The divisional review constitutes final approval of grades
except when grades are changed on appeal.
Divisional Review Committee
- In each division, a committee chaired by the divisional head or designate, and where
appropriate, an additional committee structure, with the chairs (or their designates) of
departments or other academic units of divisions serving as chairs, shall:
- administer the implementation of the University Grading Practices Policy at the
divisional level and oversee the general consistency of grading procedures with the
division;
- approve and administer the University's specific regulations concerning the grade scale
or scales to be used, the assignment of non-grade designators for course work, classroom
procedures and approval methods of evaluation;
- review, adjust and approve course grades recommended by instructors. The grades
recommended for any individual student in the professional faculties may be adjusted
according to his or her performance in the course or program as determined by the
committee. The divisional committee has the final responsibility for assigning the
official course grade.
Classroom Procedures
- To ensure that the method of evaluation in every course reflects appropriate academic
standards and fairness to students, divisional regulations governing classroom procedures
must be consistent with the practices below.
- As early as possible in each course (and no later than the division's last date for
course enrolment) the instructor shall make available to the class, and shall file with
the division or department, the methods by which student performance shall be evaluated.
This should include whether the methods of evaluation shall be essays, tests,
examinations, etc., the relative weight of these methods in relation to the overall score,
and the timing of each major evaluation.
- After the methods of evaluation have been known, the instructor may not change them or
their relative weight without the consent of at least a simple majority of the students
enrolled in the course. Any changes shall be reported to the division or the department.
- Student performance in a course shall be assessed on more than one occasion. No one
essay, test, examination, etc. should have a value of more than 80% of the grade. Criteria
for exemption may be determined by the division.
- In courses that meet regularly as a class there shall be an examination (or
examinations) conducted formally under divisional auspices and worth (alone or in the
aggregate) at least one-third of the final grade. Criteria for exemption may be determined
by the division. The relative value of each part of an examination shall be indicated to
the student. In the case of a written examination, the value shall be indicated on the
examination paper.
- Commentary on assessed term work and time for discussion of it shall be made available
to students.
- At least one piece of term work which is a part of the evaluation of a student
performance, whether essay, lab report, review, etc., shall be returned to the student
prior to the last date for withdrawal from the course without academic penalty.
- Grades shall be recommended by the instructor in reference to the approved grades scales
on the basis of each student's overall performance. In formulating their own regulations
divisions may add to items (a) to (g) and may adopt fuller or more specific provisions,
for example in place of such terms as "a simple majority" (b), "one-third
of the final grade" (d), or in particularizing the evaluation methods referred to in
(a) and (b).
Procedures in the Event of Disruptions
- The following principles shall apply in the event of disruption of the academic program:
- The academic integrity of academic programs must be honoured; and
- Students must be treated in a fair manner recognizing their freedom of choice to attend
class or not without penalty.
Procedures
- The Vice-President and Provost, or the Academic Board, shall declare when a disruption
of the academic program has occurred. The Provost shall take steps to inform the
University community at large of the changes to be implemented, and will report to the
Committee on Academic Policy and Programs regarding the implementation of the procedures
and changes to the status of the academic programs.
- Individual instructors or multi-section co-ordinators responsible for courses that are
disrupted shall determine, as the disruption proceeds, whether any changes to classroom
procedures are needed to complete the course.
- Changes to the classroom procedures should, where possible, first be discussed with
students prior to the class in which a vote of the students present on the proposed
changes is to be taken. Changes agreed upon by consensus should be forwarded to the
department or division with a report on the attendance at the class where the vote was
taken.
- Where consensus on changes has not been arrived at, or where a vote is not feasible, the
instructor, after class discussion, will provide the division head or chair of the
department in multi-departmental faculties, with his or her recommendation, along with the
results of the classroom votes. The chair or division head shall then make a decision.
- Where classes are not able to convene, the instructor, with the prior approval of the
chair in multi-departmental faculties or the division head, shall make changes deemed
necessary to the classroom procedures. In the absence of the instructor such changes will
be made by the divisional head and require the approval of the Provost. Where courses are
to be cancelled, approval of the divisional council is required. If the divisional council
cannot meet, approval of the division head, or in the absence of the division head, the
approval of the Provost is required.
- Students must be informed of changes to classroom procedures. This may be done by
circulating the changes in writing to the class, posting in the departmental and faculty
offices, reporting to the divisional council, as well as listing in the campus press.
Should classes resume students must be informed, at class, of any changes made during the
disruption.
- Where a declared disruption occurs in a specific course after the last date to drop
courses for the academic term or session, students who do not wish to complete the
course(s) during that term or session may, prior to the last day of classes, withdraw
without academic penalty. Students who withdraw from a course prior to the last day of
classes as a result of declared disruption in that course shall receive a full refund of
the course tuition fee.
- Where students have not attended classes that are meeting, they nonetheless remain
responsible for the course work and meeting course requirements. However, where possible,
reasonable extension of deadlines for the course requirements, or provision of make-up
tests shall be made and reasonable alternative access to material covered should be
provided.
- A student who considers that disruption has unreasonably affected his or her grade in a
course may appeal the grade following the procedures as set out in each division. If the
petition is approved, the student's original grade will be replaced by either an assessed
grade or by a grade of CR/NCR, or as deemed appropriate in the particular circumstances.
Assessment in Clinical and Field Settings
- Divisions may make reasonable exemptions to the classroom procedures described above in
circumstances such as field or clinical courses where adherence to these procedures is not
possible. Nevertheless, it is obligatory that the assessment of the performance of
students in clinical or field settings should be fair, humane, valid, reliable and in
accordance with the principles enunciated in the University Grading Practices Policy.
Accordingly, where a student's performance in a clinical or field setting is to be
assessed for credit, the evaluation must encompass as a minimum:
- a formal statement describing the evaluation process, including the criteria to be used
in assessing the performance of students and the appeal mechanisms available. This
statement should be available to all students before or at the beginning of the clinical
or field experience;
- a mid-way performance evaluation with feedback to the student;
- written documentation of the final assessment. In addition, for such clinical and field
experiences, divisions must ensure that:
- clinical and field assessors are fully informed regarding University, divisional and
course policies concerning evaluation procedures, including the specific assessment
procedures to be applied in any particular field or clinical setting.
Any exception from the above would require a divisional request with explanation for
approval by the Governing Council.
Grade Review and Approval Process
- The following principles and procedures shall govern the grade review and approval
process.
- The distribution of grades in any course shall not be predetermined by any system of
quotas that specifies the number or percentage of grades allowable at any grade level.
- However, a division may provide broad limits to instructors setting out a reasonable
distribution of grades in the division or department. Such broad limits shall recognize
that considerable variance in class grades is not unusual. The division may request an
explanation of any grades for a course that exceed the limits and hence appear not to be
based on the approved grade scales or otherwise appear anomalous in reference to the
Policy. It is understood that this section shall only be used when the class size is
thirty students or greater. Each division shall make known in the divisional Calendar the
existence of any such limits.
- The criterion that the Divisional Review Committee shall employ in its evaluation is
whether the instructor has followed the University Grading Practices Policy. The Review
committee shall not normally adjust grades unless the consequences of allowing the grades
to stand would be injurious to the standards of the University, or the class in general.
- Membership on the Divisional Review Committee may include students but should not
include members of the divisional appeals committee(s).
- Where grades have been adjusted by a divisional committee, the students as well as the
instructor shall be informed. On request, the students or the instructor shall be given
the reason for the adjustment of grades, a description of the methodology used to adjust
the grades, and a description of the divisional appeal procedure.
- Where a departmental review committee changes course grades, the faculty office shall be
so informed. Having done so, the faculty office shall relay this information, upon
request, to the students or the instructor with a description as to the reason for the
change and the methodology used.
- Past statistical data, including drop-out rates, mean arithmetic average, etc., should
be provided to the Divisional Review Committee as background information where available.
The committee will not use this information exclusively to judge whether a specific grades
distribution is anomalous. Rather, the information should provide part of the basis for an
overall review of grades in a division.
- Where class grades have been changed, or when the Divisional Review Committee had
reservations about the grades, the issue will be taken up with the instructor by the
division or department head, with a view to ensuring that the Grading Practices Policy is
followed in future.
Appeal Procedure
Every division shall establish divisional appeal procedures. Students may appeal grades
according to the procedures established for that purpose in the division. The appeal may
be made whether marks have been altered by the review process or not. These procedures
shall be outlined in the divisional Calendar, and available upon request at the faculty or
registrar's office.
Student Access to Examination Papers
- All divisions should provide access to copies of the previous year's final examination
papers and other years' papers where feasible. Exemptions may be granted by an appropriate
committee of the division or department.
- All divisions should provide students with the opportunity within a reasonable time to
review their examination paper where feasible. A recovery fee should be set to cover
administrative costs including photocopying.
- All divisions should provide, in addition to the customary re-reading of papers and the
re-checking of marks, the opportunity for students to petition for the re-reading of their
examination where feasible. A cost recovery fee should be set and returned where
appropriate.
Conflict of Interest
- Where the instructor or a student has a conflict of interest, or is in a situation where
a fair and objective assessment may not be possible, this should be disclosed to the chair
or division head who shall take steps to ensure fairness and objectivity.
DISCIPLINE: CODE OF BEHAVIOUR ON ACADEMIC MATTERS
The Governing Council of the University of Toronto has approved a Code of Behaviour,
which sets out clearly the standard of conduct in academic matters expected of members of
the University community. The Code is enforced by the Provost and the Disciplinary
Tribunal. Below are extracts from the Code, covering offences, sanctions and procedures as
they apply to students. The full text is available from the Office of the Dean, and the
Offices of College Registrars.
The University and its members have a responsibility to ensure that a climate that
might encourage, or conditions that might enable, cheating, misrepresentation or
unfairness not be tolerated. To this end all must acknowledge that seeking credit or other
advantages by fraud or misrepresentation, or seeking to disadvantage others by disruptive
behaviour is unacceptable, as is any dishonesty or unfairness in dealing with the work or
record of a student.
Wherever in the Code an offence is described as depending on "knowing", the
offence shall likewise be deemed to have committed if the person ought reasonably to have
known.
B.I. - Offences
- It shall be an offence for a student knowingly:
- to forge or in any other way alter or falsify any document or evidence required for
admission to the University, or to utter, circulate or make use of any such forged,
altered or falsified document, whether the record be in print or electronic form;
- to use or possess an unauthorized aid or aids or obtain unauthorized assistance in any
academic examination or term test or in connection with any other form of academic work;
- to personate another person, or to have another person personate, at any academic
examination or term test or in connection with any other form of academic work;
- to represent as one's own any idea or expression of an idea or work of another in any
academic examination or term test or in connection with any other form of academic work,
i.e. to commit plagiarism;
- to submit, without the knowledge and approval of the instructor to whom it is submitted,
any academic work for which credit has previously been obtained or is being sought in
another course or program of study in the University or elsewhere;
- to submit for credit any academic work containing a purported statement of fact or
reference to a source which has been concocted.
- It shall be an offence for a faculty member knowingly:
- to approve any of the previously described offences;
- to evaluate an application for admission or transfer to a course or program of study by
other than duly established and published criteria;
- to evaluate academic work by a student by reference to any criterion that does not
relate to its merit, to the time within which it is to be submitted or to the manner in
which it is to be performed.
- It shall be an offence for a faculty member and student alike knowingly:
- to forge or in any other way alter or falsify any academic record, or to utter,
circulate or make use of any such forged, altered or falsified record, whether the record
be in print or electronic form.
- to engage in any form of cheating, academic dishonesty or misconduct, fraud or
misrepresentation not herein otherwise described, in order to obtain academic credit or
other academic advantage of any kind.
- A graduate of the University may be charged with any of the above offences committed
intentionally while he or she was an active student, when, in the opinion of the Provost,
the offence, if detected, would have resulted in a sanction sufficiently severe that the
degree would not have been granted at the time it was.
B.II. - Parties to Offences
- Every member is a party to an offence under this Code who knowingly:
- actually commits it;
- does or omits to do anything for the purpose of aiding or assisting another member to
commit the offence;
- does or omits to do anything for the purpose of aiding or assisting any other person
who, if that person were a member, would have committed the offence;
- abets, counsels, procures or conspires with another member to commit or be a party to an
offence; or
- abets, counsels, procures or conspires with any other person who, if that person were a
member, would have committed or have been a part to the offence.
- Every party to an offence under this Code is liable upon admission of the commission
thereof, or upon conviction, as the case may be, to the sanctions applicable to that
offence.
- Every member who, having an intent to commit an offence under this Code, does or omits
to do anything for the purpose of carrying out that intention (other than mere preparation
to commit the offence) is guilty of an attempt to commit the offence and liable upon
conviction to the same sanctions as if he or she had committed the offence.
- When a group is found guilty of an offence under this Code, every officer, director or
agent of the group, being a member of the University, who directed, authorized or
participated in the commission of the offence is a party to and guilty of the offence and
is liable upon conviction to the sanctions provided for the offence.
C.I.(a) Divisional Procedures
NOTE: Where a student commits an offence, the faculty in which the student is
registered has responsibility over the student in the matter. In the case of Scarborough
and Erindale colleges, the college is deemed to be the faculty.
- No hearing within the meaning of Section 2 of the Statutory Powers of Procedures Act is
required for the purposes of, or in connection with, any of the discussions, meetings and
determinations referred to in Section C.I.(a), and such discussions, meetings and
determinations are not proceedings of the Tribunal.
- Where an instructor has reasonable grounds to believe that an academic offence has been
committed by a student, the instructor shall so inform the student immediately after
learning of the act or conduct complained of, giving reasons, and invite the student to
discuss the matter. Nothing the student says in such a discussion may be used or
receivable in evidence against the student.
- If after such discussion, the instructor is satisfied that no academic offence has been
committed, he or she shall so inform the student and no further action shall be taken in
the matter by the instructor, unless fresh evidence comes to the attention of the
instructor, in which case he or she may again proceed in accordance with subsection 2.
- If after such discussion, the instructor believes that an academic offence has been
committed by the student, or if the student fails or neglects to respond to the invitation
for discussion, the instructor shall make a report of the matter to the department chair
or through the department chair to the dean. (See also Section C.I.(b)1.)
- When the dean or the department chair, as the case may be, has been so informed, he or
she shall notify the student in writing accordingly, provide him or her with a copy of the
Code, and subsequently afford the student an opportunity for discussion of the matter. In
the case of the dean being informed, the chair of the department and the instructor shall
be invited by the dean to be present at the meeting with the student. The dean shall
conduct the interview.
- Before proceeding with the meeting, the dean shall inform the student that he or she is
entitled to seek advice, or to be accompanied by counsel at the meeting, before making,
and is not obliged to make, any statement or admission, but shall warn that if he or she
makes any statement or admission in the meeting, it may be used or receivable in evidence
against the student in the hearing of any charge with respect to the offence or alleged
offence in question. The dean shall also advise the student, without further comment or
discussion, of the sanctions that may be imposed under Section C.I.(b), and that the dean
is not obliged to impose a sanction but may instead request that the Provost lay a charge
against the student. Where such advice and warning have been given, the statements and
admissions, if any, made in such a meeting may be used or received in evidence against the
student in any such hearing.
- If the dean, on the advice of the department chair and the instructor, or if the
department chair, on the advice of the instructor, subsequently decides that no academic
offence has been committed and that no further action in the matter is required, the
student shall be so informed in writing and the student's work shall be accepted for
normal evaluation or, if the student was prevented from withdrawing from the course by the
withdrawal date, he or she shall be allowed to do so. Thereafter, the matter shall not be
introduced into evidence at a Tribunal hearing for another offence.
- If the student admits the alleged offence, the dean or the department chair may either
impose the sanction that he or she considers appropriate under Section C.I.(B) or refer
the matter to the dean or Provost, as the case may be, and in either event shall inform
the student in writing accordingly. No further action in the matter shall be taken by the
instructor, the department chair or the dean if the dean imposes a sanction.
- If the student is dissatisfied with a sanction imposed by the department chair or the
dean, as the case may be, the student may refer the matter to the dean or Provost, as the
case may be, for consideration.
- If the student does not admit the alleged offence, the dean may, after consultation with
the instructor and the department chair, requires that the Provost lay a charge against
the student. If the Provost agrees to lay a charge, the case shall then proceed to the
Trial Division of the Tribunal.
- Normally, decanal procedures will not be examined in a hearing before the Tribunal. A
failure to carry out the procedures referred to in this Section, or any defect or
irregularity in such procedures, shall not invalidate any subsequent proceedings of or
before the Tribunal, unless the chair of the hearing considers that such failure, defect
or irregularity resulted in a substantial wrong, detriment or prejudice to the accused.
The chair will determine at the opening of the hearing whether there is going to be any
objection to defect, failure or irregularity.
- No degree, diploma or certificate of the University shall be conferred or awarded, nor
shall a student be allowed to withdraw from a course from the time of the alleged offence
until the final disposition of the accusation. However, a student shall be permitted to
use University facilities while a decision is pending, unless there are valid reasons for
the dean to bar him or her from a facility. When or at any time after an accusation has
been reported to the dean, he or she may cause a notation to be recorded on the student's
academic record and transcript in a course and/or the student's academic status is under
review. A student upon whom a sanction has been imposed by the dean or the department
chair under Section C.I.(b) or who has been convicted by the Tribunal shall not be allowed
to withdraw from a course so as to avoid the sanction imposed.
- A record of cases disposed of under Section C.I.(a) and of the sanctions imposed shall
be kept in the academic unit concerned and may be referred to by the dean in connection
with a decision to prosecute, or by the prosecution in making representations as to the
sanction or sanctions to be imposed by the Tribunal, for any subsequent offence committed
by the student. Information on such cases shall be available to other academic units upon
request and such cases shall be reported by the dean to the Secretary of the Tribunal for
use in the Provost's annual report to the Academic Board. The dean may contact the
Secretary of the Tribunal for advice or for information on cases disposed of under Section
C.II. hereof.
- Where a proctor or invigilator, who is not a faculty member, has reason to believe that
an academic offence has been committed by a student at an examination or test, the proctor
or invigilator shall so inform the student's dean or department chair, as the case may be,
who shall proceed as if he or she were an instructor, by analogy to the other provisions
of this section.
- In the case of alleged offences not covered by the above and not involving the
submission of academic work, such as those concerning forgery or uttering, library or
computer material or library or computer resources, and in cases involving cancellation,
recall or suspension of a degree, diploma or certificate, the procedure shall be regulated
by analogy to the other procedures of this section.
C.I.(b) Divisional Sanctions
- In an assignment worth 10 percent or less of the final grade, the department chair may
handle the matter if:
- the student admits guilt; and
- the assignment of a penalty is limited to at most a mark of zero for the piece of work.
If the student does not admit guilt, or if the department chair chooses, the matter shall
be brought before the dean.
- One or more of the following sanctions may be imposed by the dean where a student admits
to the commission of an offence:
- an oral and/or written reprimand;
- an oral and/or written reprimand and, with the permission of the instructor, the
resubmission of the piece of academic work, in respect of which the offence was committed,
for evaluation. Such a sanction shall be imposed only for minor offences and where the
student has committed no previous offence;
- assignment of a grade of zero or a failure for the piece of academic work in respect of
which the offence was committed;
- assignment of a penalty in the form of a reduction of the final grade in the course in
respect of which the offence was committed;
- denial of privileges to use any facility of the University, including library and
computer facilities;
- a monetary fine to cover the costs of replacing damaged property or misused supplies in
respect of which the offence was committed;
- assignment of a grade of zero or a failure for the course in respect of which the
offence was committed;
- suspension from attendance in a course or courses, a program, an academic division or
unit, or the University for a period of not more than twelve months. Where a student has
not completed a course or courses in respect of which an offence has not been committed,
withdrawal from the course or courses without academic penalty shall be allowed.
- The dean shall have the power to record any sanction imposed on the student's academic
record and transcript for such length of time as he or she considers appropriate. However,
the sanctions of suspension or a notation specifying academic misconduct as the reason for
a grade of zero for a course shall normally be recorded for a period of five years.
- The Provost shall, from time to time, indicate appropriate sanctions for certain
offences. These guidelines shall be sent for information to the Academic Board and
attached to the Code as Appendix "C".
CONDUCT: CODE OF STUDENT CONDUCT
Summary of Code of Student Conduct
Non-academic offences are defined in the University's Code of Student Conduct (1992), the
full text of which may be obtained from the Office of the Assistant Vice-President,
Student Affairs. A summary of the Code is provided below.
Extracts from the Code are printed here in ordinary type, and additional comments etc.,
are in italics. References in square brackets are to original section numbering in the
Code.
[B.] Offences
The following offences constitute conduct that shall be deemed to be offences under this
Code, when committed by a student of the University of Toronto, provided that such
conduct:
- has not been dealt with as failure to meet standards of professional conduct as required
by a college, faculty or school; and
- is not specifically assigned to the jurisdiction of the University Tribunal, as in the
case of offences described in the Code of Behaviour on Academic Matters, or to another
disciplinary body within the University of Toronto, as in the case of sexual harassment as
described in the Policy and Procedures: Sexual Harassment; and
- except as otherwise provided herein, occurs on premises of the University of Toronto or
elsewhere in the course of activities sponsored by the University of Toronto or by any of
its divisions.
1. Offences Against Persons
- No person shall assault another person sexually or threaten any other person with sexual
assault.
- No person shall otherwise assault another person, threaten any other person with bodily
harm, or knowingly cause any other person to fear bodily harm.
- No person shall knowingly create a condition that unnecessarily endangers the health or
safety of other persons.
- No person shall threaten any other person with damage to such person's property, or
knowingly cause any other person to fear damage to her or his property.
- No person shall engage in a course of vexatious conduct that is directed at one or more
specific individuals, and that is based on the race, ancestry, place of origin, colour,
ethnic origin, citizenship, creed, age, marital status, handicap, receipt of public
assistance or record of offences of that individual or those individuals, and that is
known to be unwelcome, and that exceeds the bounds of freedom of expression or academic
freedom as these are understood in University policies and accepted practices, including
but not restricted to, those explicitly adopted.
(Note: terms in this section are to be understood as they are defined or used in the
Ontario Human Rights Code.)
- No person shall, by engaging in the conduct described in subsection (ii) below, whether
on the premises of the University or away from the premises of the University, cause
another person or persons to fear for their safety or the safety of another person known
to them while on the premises of the University of Toronto or in the course of activities
sponsored by the University of Toronto or by any of its divisions, or cause another person
or persons to be impeded in exercising the freedom to participate reasonably in the
programs of the University and in activities in or on the University premises, knowing
that their conduct will cause such fear, or recklessly as to whether their conduct causes
such fear.
- The conduct mentioned in subsection (i) consists of
- repeatedly following from place to place the other person or anyone known to them;
- repeatedly and persistently communicating with, either directly or indirectly, the other
person or anyone known to them;
- besetting or repeatedly watching the dwelling-house, or place where the other person, or
anyone known to them, resides, works, carries on business or happens to be; or
- engaging in threatening conduct directed at the other person or any member of the
family, friends or colleagues of the other person.
2. Disruption
No person shall cause by action, threat or otherwise, a disturbance that the member knows
obstructs any activity organized by the University of Toronto or by any of its divisions,
or the right of another member or members to carry on their legitimate activities, to
speak or to associate with others.
For example, peaceful picketing or other activity outside a class or meeting that does not
substantially interfere with the communication inside, or impede access to the meeting, is
an acceptable expression of dissent. And silent or symbolic protest is not to be
considered disruption under this Code. But noise that obstructs the conduct of a meeting
or forcible blocking of access to an activity constitutes disruption.
3. Offences Involving Property
- No person shall knowingly take, destroy or damage premises of the University of Toronto.
- No person shall knowingly take, destroy or damage any physical property that is not her
or his own.
- No person shall knowingly destroy or damage information or intellectual property
belonging to the University of Toronto or to any of its members.
- No person, in any manner whatsoever, shall knowingly deface the inside or outside of any
building of the University of Toronto.
- No person, knowing the effects or property to have been appropriated without
authorization, shall possess effects or property of the University of Toronto.
- No person, knowing the effects or property to have been appropriated without
authorization, shall possess any property that is not her or his own.
- No person shall knowingly create a condition that unnecessarily endangers or threatens
destruction of the property of the University of Toronto or of any of its members.
4. Unauthorized Entry or Presence
No person shall, contrary to the expressed instruction of a person or persons authorized
to give such instruction, or with intent to damage or destroy the premises of the
University of Toronto or damage, destroy or steal any property on the premises of the
University of Toronto that is not her or his own, or without just cause knowingly enter or
remain in or on any such premises.
5. Unauthorized Use of University Facilities, Equipment or Services
- No person shall knowingly use any facility, equipment or service of the University of
Toronto contrary to the expressed instruction of a person or persons authorized to give
such instruction, or without just cause.
- No person shall knowingly gain access to or use any University computing or internal or
external communications facility to which legitimate authorization has not been granted.
No person shall use any such facility for any commercial, disruptive or unauthorized
purpose.
Appropriate uses for University connections to external networks are described, for
example, in the policy document "Appropriate Use Policy for the ONet Network."
- No person shall knowingly mutilate, misplace, misfile, or render inoperable any stored
information such as books, film, data files or programs from a library, computer or other
such information storage, processing or retrieval system.
6. False Charges
No person shall knowingly or maliciously bring a false charge against any member of the
University of Toronto under this Code.
7. Aiding in the Commission of an Offence
No person shall counsel, procure, conspire with or aid a person in the commission of an
offence defined in this Code.
8. Refusal to Comply with Sanctions
No person found to have committed an offence under this Code shall refuse to comply with a
sanction or sanctions imposed under the procedures of this Code.
9. Unauthorized Possession or Use of Firearms or Ammunition
No person other than a peace officer or a member of the Canadian Forces acting in the
course of duty shall possess or use any firearm or ammunition on the premises of the
University of Toronto without the permission of the officer of the University having
authority to grant such permission.
[C.] Hearing Procedures
- Whenever possible and appropriate, reason and moral suasion shall be used to resolve
issues of individual behaviour before resort is made to formal disciplinary procedures.
- An Investigating Officer, who may be a student, shall be appointed for a term of up to
three years by the principal, dean or director (hereinafter called "head") of
each faculty, college or school, in which students are registered (hereinafter called
"division"), after consultation with the elected student leader or leaders of
the division, to investigate complaints made against student members of that division.
- A Hearing Officer, who may be a student, shall be appointed for a term of up to three
years by the council of each division to decide on complaints under this Code made against
the student members of that division. Hearing Officers shall hold office until their
successors are appointed.
- If the Investigating Officer is, for any reason, unable to conduct an investigation,
then the head of the division shall appoint another person as Investigating Officer for
that particular case. If the Hearing Officer is, for any reason, unable to chair the
hearing of any case, then the senior chair of the University Tribunal shall appoint
another person as Hearing Officer for the particular case.
- Where the head of a division has reason to believe that a non-academic offence as
defined in this Code may have been committed by a student member or members of the
division, the Investigating Officer will conduct an investigation into the case. After
having completed the investigation, the Investigating Officer shall report on the
investigation to the head of the division. If the head of the division concludes, on the
basis of this report, that the student or students may have committed an offence under the
Code of Student Conduct, the head of the division shall have the discretion to request
that a hearing take place to determine whether the student or students have committed the
offence alleged.
- The hearing will be chaired by the Hearing Officer. The case will be presented by the
Investigating Officer, who may be assisted and represented by legal counsel. If the right
to a hearing is waived, or after a hearing, the Hearing Officer will rule on whether the
student or students have committed the offence alleged and may impose one or more
sanctions as listed below. The accused student or students may be assisted by another
person, who may be legal counsel.
- Appeals against decisions of bodies acting under authority from the council of a
division to hear cases arising out of residence codes of behaviour may be made to the
Hearing Officer of the division, where provision therefor has been made by the council of
the division.
- Appeals against the decision of the Hearing Officer may be made to the Discipline
Appeals Board of the Governing Council.
- Where the head of a division has reason to believe that a non-academic offence may have
been committed by a group of students including students from that division and from
another division or divisions, the head may consult with the head of the other division or
divisions involved and may then agree that some or all of the cases will be investigated
jointly by the Investigating Officers of the divisions of the students involved and that
some or all of the cases will be heard together by the Hearing Officer of one of the
divisions agreed upon by the heads and presented by one of the Investigating Officers
agreed upon by the heads.
[D.] Sanctions
The following sanctions or combinations of them may be imposed upon students found to have
committed an offence under this Code. In addition, students found to have committed an
offence may be placed on conduct probation for a period not to exceed one year, with the
provision that one or more of the following sanctions will be applied if the conduct
probation is violated.
- Formal written reprimand.
- Order for restitution, rectification or the payment of damages.
- A fine or bond for good behaviour not to exceed $100.
- Requirement of public service work not to exceed 25 hours.
- Denial of access to specified services, activities or facilities of the University for a
period of up to one year.
The following two sanctions, which would directly affect a
student's registration in a program, may be imposed only where it has been determined that
the offence committed is of such a serious nature that the student's continued
registration threatens the academic function of the University of Toronto or any of its
divisions or the ability of other students to continue their programs of study.
- Suspension from registration in any course or program of a division or divisions for a
period of up to one year.
- Recommendation of expulsion from the University.
Calendar Home ~ Calendar
Contents ~ Contact
Us ~ Arts and Science Home
Copyright © 1999, University of Toronto